Is it really?
What is it with smart academics that can’t resist the urge to tell us whats good and whats bad for us? Or that doing A is better than doing B?
Clay Shirky is one of my heros and a very very clever person and, in principle, his argument of a seismic change in media (from passive consumption to active participation) is spot on.
And as much as I share and support his optimistic vision of future of mass participation and creativity his argument has sometimes more holes than a block of dutch cheese (I don’t know where to start and probably miss some points…anyway…)
Talking about surplus of free time he writes
Now, the interesting thing about a surplus like that is that society doesn’t know what to do with it at first–hence the gin, hence the sitcoms.
Dear Clay….Humans got pissed since they invented booze. And sitcoms have evolved as a cultural form of expression like theater and films before them, NOT as a reaction to a downtime crisis!
And every half-hour that I watched that was a half an hour I wasn’t posting at my blog or editing Wikipedia or contributing to a mailing list.
C’mmon….Downtime is as important today as it always has been if not more considering the fact that the stimulus we’re surrounded with are 100 times greater than in the past. What’smore, TV is only one, albeit the most popular downtime activity tool. So even with all the most convincing mathematical calculations it is rather daft to assume that if people will watch less TV they will start writing more wikipedia articles or produce more LOLcats images - they can do million other things.
To paraphrase one of his calculations (”Let’s say that everything stays 99 percent the same, that people watch 99 percent as much television as they used to, but 1 percent of that is carved out for producing and for sharing”) you might argue that instead they will go jogging or the gym - hey, we just solved America’s obesity problem!
Culture production indeed has become a collective endeavor and we only now begin to realise what amazing opportunities we are presented with. But people don’t change. Technology changes, the world changes, but people still are the same - and since the very early days of homo sapiens, in some parts of our daily lives we like and NEED to do nothing. We NEED passive consumption. And occasionally we NEED to get pissed as well…
Whats with that Christian work ethics??? You really should read Tim Hodgkinson
Share This