MINI’s new viral sux

Mini

In the last couple of (working) days I’ve been reviewing cool digital carmakers digital campaigns (will post more in detail when I’m done). A couple of hours ago I came accross this new MINI viral and while usually I’m not using this blog for negative blogging on creative, this time I can’t help myself.

I like MINI and I think that generally their comms are great fun. I wasn’t a big fan of their previous viral campaign, yet it had something surprising and witty in it. But the new one is completely useless and daft (and not in a cheeky, farcical MINI style). Here’s how ‘MINI mail’ works- you send a message to your friend , which is then written by a MINI car burning rubber in a parking lot (see pic above). what??? yup, this is what it is. Makes me yawn, really.  So i did a bit of search and found more about it on iMedia Connections showcase:

"Our panelists felt this smooth, savvy viral marketing
piece from Firstborn truly incorporates the MINI Cooper brand into the
online experience of customizing a vehicle".

Am I missing something here?

Comments 4

  1. Mat Morrison wrote:

    No. I don’t think you’re missing anything. It’s just a bit sad in its conception. And it’s a little poor in it’s execution, too. What’s this “message” about? Why should I want to customise my mini? And - most pedantcally - why aren’t the skid marks done properly? Wouldn’t they cross each other on the curves?

    Also, this “using cars to spell out messages” has so-oo been done already in a TV spot. Can’t recall which, sadly, or I’d supply a link

    Posted 18 Oct 2006 at 1:58 pm
  2. Harry wrote:

    It’s weak sauce as we say in the U.S.

    I can’t figure out who the intended audience is and what insight may have been used for the concept.

    I’m struggling with this very problem as we speak-viral for the sake of viral.

    Posted 18 Oct 2006 at 10:21 pm
  3. Asi wrote:

    Mat / Harry - thanks for dropping by. I’m less interested in the execution subtleties, I just think the idea is dull.

    Insight? what insight? and I don’t agree to the viral is good as long as it is talked about. It gives legitimacy for stupid, useless, badly executed works.

    A.

    Posted 19 Oct 2006 at 8:18 am
  4. dan wrote:

    The ‘aveaword’ viral was from the UK, this one is from the US.

    Posted 19 Oct 2006 at 6:33 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

Close
E-mail It