<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If social media isn&#8217;t free then who has to pay the bill?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://no-mans-blog.com/2010/03/08/if-social-media-isnt-free-then-who-has-to-pay-the-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://no-mans-blog.com/2010/03/08/if-social-media-isnt-free-then-who-has-to-pay-the-bill/</link>
	<description>Asi Sharabi's Private Selections</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 13:18:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: asi</title>
		<link>http://no-mans-blog.com/2010/03/08/if-social-media-isnt-free-then-who-has-to-pay-the-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-290466</link>
		<dc:creator>asi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-mans-blog.com/?p=1396#comment-290466</guid>
		<description>Thanks Matt. good point.

i think that social media can be what you make of it. I never believed the new-marketing fundamentalists that say &quot;it&#039;s all about X&quot; or &quot;it&#039;s NOT X it&#039;s Y&quot;

If you treat it like a broadcast channel, then so be it. My opinion was always that it can be much more than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Matt. good point.</p>
<p>i think that social media can be what you make of it. I never believed the new-marketing fundamentalists that say &#8220;it&#8217;s all about X&#8221; or &#8220;it&#8217;s NOT X it&#8217;s Y&#8221;</p>
<p>If you treat it like a broadcast channel, then so be it. My opinion was always that it can be much more than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Daniels</title>
		<link>http://no-mans-blog.com/2010/03/08/if-social-media-isnt-free-then-who-has-to-pay-the-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-290414</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://no-mans-blog.com/?p=1396#comment-290414</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard this &quot;social media is not a channel&quot; argument quite a lot lately. I think I get fundamentally what you&#039;re aiming for--social media is not box to check in the marketing mix (perhaps we should get the word &quot;media&quot; removed). 

But really, especially in the framework of spending, how could it possibly be a business expense? Is an email newsletter a business expense? Or any piece of loyalty spending? Is social media really any different?

It seems like all we are trying to do with the &quot;social media is not a channel&quot; talk is to make it seem more important than it really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard this &#8220;social media is not a channel&#8221; argument quite a lot lately. I think I get fundamentally what you&#8217;re aiming for&#8211;social media is not box to check in the marketing mix (perhaps we should get the word &#8220;media&#8221; removed). </p>
<p>But really, especially in the framework of spending, how could it possibly be a business expense? Is an email newsletter a business expense? Or any piece of loyalty spending? Is social media really any different?</p>
<p>It seems like all we are trying to do with the &#8220;social media is not a channel&#8221; talk is to make it seem more important than it really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

