In the world of internet debate, there’s one tactic so fearsome, so deadly, only the masters of online commenting dare wield it….
-
Pages
-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
In the world of internet debate, there’s one tactic so fearsome, so deadly, only the masters of online commenting dare wield it….
The almighty geeks of Poke just released over 30,000 balloons across the internet and it looks absolutely amazing. It’s unlike anything you’ve seen before.
[I have a feeling that no one's gonna work here this week...we're all gonna kick some ass]
The new darlings of indie-folk-rock, Fleet Foxes are well worth the hype. I saw them live last week and it was absolutely incredible. These remarkable vocal harmonies back with clouds of organs, tom-toms, bells and assorted stringed instruments creating rich, swirling heartwarming melodies. It’s hard to believe that this mature, pastoral album is a debut. Simply beautiful - looks like a very strong contender for my album of the year.
The Notwist - The Devil, You & Me / Neon Golden
Every now and than an album comes up that reminds me that tracking all the great music today is a full-time job. How did The Notwist get off my radar is God’s little secret. I got the new album - You, Me and the Devil from Niv , really liked the sound so checked their records (accidental pun) and discovered their 2002 masterpiece Neon Golden.
Beautiful, contemplative art-rock (IDM? glitch-pop?) Neon Golden is one of the most exquisite electronic albums I’ve ever listened to. And the new one, although not as great is well worth a listen. It grows on you like a velvety sonic coat. Interesting and peculiar at first, it’s secrets unlock slowly to reveal a mesmerising album.
Another gem that got off my radar and thanks to Dave I now indulge my ears with this weird and wonderful French delight. Apparently Le Fil was the darling of music buffs back in 2005 for it’s multi-tracked, playfully, cleverly sounds of Camille’s voice. I don’t understand 90% of the lyrics (most of it is in French, but every now and then an English phrase slips in) sometimes she sings, sometimes she talks, argues with herself, mumbles, thinks aloud - so unusual, so unique, so lovely. Nearly all the sounds were generated through the looping and manipulation of her voice. I just purchased her recently released new album, sang mostly in English this time and after one quick listen I have the feeling it’s going to be just as good.
Is it just me or every other page on The Internets now has that ‘Share This” functionality? I was looking for something in online dictionary and there it was, the new hygiene functionality:
I really didn’t know what to do first shall i digg it or post it on facebook?
Andy just launched a brilliant little project called I Feel London. It’s a sweet little google maps based platform that invites you to explore (and share!) what people are up to in London when they are in a certain mood.
Mood-based geo-tagging is border genius. Think about it for a second and you’ll realise that even if you never thought about it this way, living in a big city, you not only experience places differently when in different moods but you’re actually doing different things in different places while in different moods (bloody obvious I know…but have you ever thought about it this way???).
Whats your romantic London? and naughty? what about energetic?
I just marked my energetic London canal cycling. Usually between May to Sep, when the weather is nice and sunrise is early and I’m filled with vital energies I like to cycle to work through the canal all the way from NW10 to Shorditch (10.5miles)
Check it out here it’s luuuuuvely.
Video reactions are one of the most fascinating things on youtube. It’s a new form of dialouge, self-to-other expression platform which can take many forms and shapes depends on the context. I find this conversational form an anthropological goldmine. One video can spark a vast range of human communicative behaviours, from rant to praise, from empathy to nastiness, from mundane to artistic from daft to philosophical and more.
You can never predict what kind of response n a video can ignite, but this emergence of a micro, temporary, situational community where people gather around a shared object and publicly react to and converse with it (as well as with one another) is a wonderful demonstration of our social nature.
I come from a school of thought that argues that the individual self is social in origin and dialogical in function. The dialogical self reflects and appropriates the voices of society and significant others, and video reactions are wonderful examples of communicative actions between self and other.
Ever since I wrote this post I had this dream of having a massive screen in a public space for an arthropology (art+anthropology that is) installation of video response. That is probably a little bit too ambitious so with the very kind help of the magnificent Greg & Nico(you will be missed mate), I’m happy to present Reaction Wall - a permanent exhibition of human social interaction in modern, digital culture .
It’s a 3×3 wall of youtube videos with the central one (also marked with red frame) the piece that started the ‘videosation’.
I’m hoping to change the videos every couple of weeks or so and would welcome any contributions - if you know of an interesting video that sparked interesting reactions please drop me a line.
I LOVE this idea of hijacking public spaces and making them more playful (it’s not entirely new concept as skaters been doing that for years but for their own sake). Next project should be planting hammocks on the tube…
Play as you go by Bruno Taylor:
It was interesting to observe the different reactions of the passers-by in the film. Tells you a lot about the issue of trust in modern urban living. Don’t know if it was the fear of a candid camera or simply health&safety issues but you could clearly see peoples’ curiosity and inhibitions come into play and dictate their behaviour.
via Andy Polaine
“Over the past few years I’ve had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain, remapping the neural circuitry, reprogramming the memory. My mind isn’t going—so far as I can tell—but it’s changing. I’m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I’m reading. Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy. My mind would get caught up in the narrative or the turns of the argument, and I’d spend hours strolling through long stretches of prose. That’s rarely the case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle”.
Wow. I can’t remember when was the last time I’ve read something that resonated so strongly with my personal experience. I was reading these lines and my heart started going faster and faster… yes! thats exactly how i feel! I’m not alone in my increasingly severe ADD!
In this thoughts provoking article, Nicholas Carr goes on to recall Marshall McLuhan brilliant observation that media are not just passive channels of information. They supply the stuff of thought, but they also shape the process of thought.
Luckily I can still get lost and immerse myself in a good fiction. But I find it difficult to consume non-fiction literature whether business or scientific books. The web’s way of reading somehow killed my ability to concentrate and delve deeper into something. The frantic browsing, scanning and skimming of information on the web - articles, blog posts, links, videos and feeds - all with constant interruptions have indeed alter my way of thinking for the worse.
But there’s a bit of conspiracy theory tone in the article that i find hard to accept:
The idea that our minds should operate as high-speed data-processing machines is not only built into the workings of the Internet, it is the network’s reigning business model as well. The faster we surf across the Web—the more links we click and pages we view—the more opportunities Google and other companies gain to collect information about us and to feed us advertisements. Most of the proprietors of the commercial Internet have a financial stake in collecting the crumbs of data we leave behind as we flit from link to link—the more crumbs, the better. The last thing these companies want is to encourage leisurely reading or slow, concentrated thought. It’s in their economic interest to drive us to distraction.
It’s an interesting point but I’m not sure I buy into that. It’s not (just) google that making us stupid. For me it’s the great paradox of abundance of information beautifully epitomise in ‘drinking from the media firehose’ metaphor that alter our minds and the way we read and think.
It’s the combination of (1) the extreme abundance of content that generated constant minor anxiety that we’re missing something, (2) the RSS culture that made it so easy to become feed-junkies and generated the scanning, skimming and hopping patterns of our excessive, yet shallow reading and (3) de.licio.us that gives us the illusion that ‘you know what you store’ or that if you park a half-read article you will come back to it later when you have the time or when you ‘really’ need it.
But if I’m honest with myself, my de.licio.us is just a massive bin for half-read information that I’ll never actually read or get back to because I’m too busy skimming through and saving other stuff…
We need better discipline and more tools to help us switch off and restore our ability to concentrate, contemplate and process information. It’s easy to blame google but at the end of the day, it’s us feed-narcotics that add 5 more feeds to our RSS reader everyday. It’s us neurotically checking our emails every 2min. It’s us skimming and hopping from one link to the other repressing the fact that the process of real learning diminished.
I strongly resist any kind of Andrew-Keenian doomsayers rhetoric. The web is us and what we do with it. And I strongly believe that the blessings to the human society and culture are by far greater than the dumbing down of individuals. Just as books and Rock ‘n’ Roll and TV in the past, google and the web do not make us stupid as a society.
But we surely need to find better ways to deal with that abundance of content/information. So far we invented productivity tools like RSS readers to help us handle massive amounts of information, which might be effective on one level but are totally ineffective on another. We now need tools to help us realise we don’t really need 500 feeds…or tools that will scans the 500 feeds for us and automatically delete/reduce the overlaps and redundant chatter.
But no such tools better than ourselves to know our limits and what good or bad for us, so at the end of the day it’s really us and our self discipline that will have to overcome that childish anxiety that we’re always missing on something. We will have to learn to curb our obsession with feeds and to re-learn our mental and intellectual boundaries.
nuf said
I was never really into Sigur Ros but their new music video is inspired by, and made in collaboration with the amazing, Ryan McGinley. It contains his signature style with naked teens running, falling from the sky, making love, dancing, playing…it’s bursting with youth erotic energies and raw sensuality…it’s truly mesmerising.
[note: this is a one off post on eroticism, i'm not on my way to a blogging career change or aspiring violet blue]
I’ve been doing some research recently into brands presence/activities on social media platforms and while I’m hoping to write something more structured in the near future, I wanted to share some early thoughts (it as a public note to self as much as it is, hopefully, a conversation starter).
On and all marketing activities on social networks sux. It’s actually fascinating (frustrating?) to see how sharp is the contrast between (bloggers’) words and (brands’) practice or, put differently, between theory and reality.
This is in fact the topic of my Age of Conversation chapter - the contrast between bloggers’ chatter and jabber and brands actual activities on social media platforms, particularly social networking sites.
“You only get to be prominent in SNS by earning trust and respect”
“It’s about giving value first”
“It’s about building relationships”
“it’s not about you, it’s about them”
“Don’t think of it as another advertising / promotion channel”
“If you want to participate in a community, you have to enrich that community”
You are probably all too familiar with the spirit of the above mantras taken from blogs and bloggers’ presentations (including this blog). This is what we passionately preach for. But if you look around, what you’ll see is mainly what Russell best described as the marketing web vs. the web that people use.
Brands activities on SNS are naturally riding on hype waves. Two years ago we saw the golden rush to create MySpace pages, then the property-boom-turn-desert(ed)-islands on Second Life and recently brand pages on Facebook sprung up like mushrooms after the rain. I now read bloggers urging brands to engage with their consumers with twitter etc.
The truth is that the vast majority of brands’ presence on social networking sites I’ve seen falls into three categories:
1. Useless, purposeless, lifeless brand pages
2. Advertising, promotions and coupons pages
3. Short term campaign pages with some competition / freebies mechanism
So, is that it? That’s all we can come up with? Is this the case of unimaginative clients and/or agencies? Simply herd thinking? Where is the value in freebies?
Or maybe there is no place for brands on social networking sites at all?
To be honest, I don’t have an answer to these questions. All I know is that just because they can doesn’t mean they should. And, yes, experimentation is fine, but you need a reason, a clear purpose. Otherwise it simply looks lame and it can even damage your brand (although admittedly, a page that no one ever visits can’t do much harm, it’s just a waste of money).
Another recurrent mantra is that brands should use social networks as equal users/members - the same way that people use social media. From what I’ve seen this rule only works well for small local brands and can be really bad for big national/global brands. When big brands start talking like the girl next door or like local indie shop it’ll most definitely look lame and makes you wanna shout, the emperor is naked!
If you are fortunate enough to be a brand that has a community of amorous fans, you should tap into these communities, listen to what they say and try help them to do what they like to do anyway, as well as surprise and delights them etc. But if you’re not one of these, I’d advise you to stay out, or just listen because it’s quite sad to see big brands trying to find a date on facebook.
The only social media platform that stands the test of time and doesn’t feel like a passing fad is blogging. Surely there are some insignificant brands’ blogs but the few dozens great one that I know have a strong sense of purpose and direction. These blogs are organic part of “the conversation” not just a bumper sticker (read Macks fantastic reports here)
What do you think?
Can you please send over some examples of really good social media activities, if you find any to prove me wrong?